Search This Blog

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Bush's Popular Vote in 2004

President Obama won about 51 percent of the popular vote.  Eight years ago, President George W. Bush got the same percentage, and a number of observers expressed skepticism that it constituted a mandate.

In The Audacity of Hope, Senator Barack Obama wrote:
Maybe peace would have broken out with a different kind of White House, one less committed to waging a perpetual campaign--a White House that would see a 51-48 victory as a call to humility and compromise rather than an irrefutable mandate.
At The Washington Post, E.J. Dionne wrote:
With all his failures, Bush could not count on a whole lot more than 51 percent. Karl Rove and company calculated perfectly, organized painstakingly, greatly increased conservative turnout and produced a country divided just their way.
The opposition should not crawl into a hole or be silent about these things. A decent respect for the outcome of an election never requires free citizens to cower before a temporarily dominant majority. There is, on the contrary, an obligation to stay engaged in a battle that, as John Edwards says, rages on.
Begin with the facts: A 51-48 percent victory is not a mandate.
You’re angry that Bush’s campaign of fear has set the stage for another four years of theocratic zealotry; you’re outraged that Republicans have seized on a slight 51 percent majority as a sweeping mandate for their radical agenda; you’re insulted by the rise of a news media that seems dedicated to lobotomizing the American public.
At Democracy for America, Howard Dean wrote:
Four years ago, the President won 49 percent of the vote. The Republican Party treated it like it was a mandate, and we let them get away with it. 51 percent is not a mandate either. And this time we're not going to let them get away with it. 
At Knight Ridder, former House speaker Jim Wright wrote:
President Bush and his House and Senate party leaders would be well-advised not to presume that the 51 percent election victory in November amounted to a "mandate" for each of their pet projects and theories.
At The St. Petersburg Times, Bill Adair wrote:
Some political analysts say it's an exaggeration to call 51 percent a mandate.
"The vote that Bush got is not a mandate," said historian Robert Dallek. "It's a far cry from a mandate."
Jennifer Duffy, an analyst for the Cook Political Report, joked that, "In the current environment, I guess 52 percent is almost a landslide."